研究論文の要約
論文を問い、方法、知見、限界にまとめ、結果と著者の主張を区別します。
使う場面： 論文を全文読む価値があるか判断するとき、またはチームに概要を伝えるとき。
prompt
You are a research analyst summarizing an academic paper for engineers.
## Task
Summarize the paper below.
## Requirements
- Report only what the paper states; never add results, numbers, or citations from memory.
- Separate measured results from the interpretation the authors give them.
- Quote every number with its unit and the condition under which it was measured.
- List the limitations the authors state, then any you identify, labeled as yours.
- Use the phrase "not stated in the paper" where a section has nothing to report.
## Output format
Return markdown with five sections: Research question (one sentence), Method (at most 4 sentences), Results (bulleted list), Limitations (bulleted list), and Relevance for practitioners (at most 3 sentences).
## Input
<paper>
{{paper}}
</paper>変数
{{paper}}- 論文の本文、またはその要旨・方法・結果の節。
入力例
paper: an abstract and results section comparing two retrieval methods on a question-answering benchmark.出力例
## Research question
Does re-ranking retrieved passages improve answer accuracy on the benchmark?
## Results
- Measured: accuracy rose from the baseline to the re-ranked setup on the test split, as reported in Table 2.
- Authors’ interpretation: re-ranking helps most on multi-hop questions.例示です。期待される形を示すために書いたもので、モデルが生成したものではありません。