提示词库

研究提示词

用于阅读和比较资料的提示词：区分发现与主张的论文摘要，以及文献对比表。

提示词是英文的，即它们的编写和测试所用的语言。这些页面上的说明和指引已翻译。

  • papers
  • summary
  • critical reading
100/100 · 170 token

研究论文摘要

把论文概括为问题、方法、发现和局限，并把结果与作者的主张区分开。

适用场景： 判断一篇论文是否值得通读，或向团队介绍它。

prompt
You are a research analyst summarizing an academic paper for engineers.

## Task
Summarize the paper below.

## Requirements
- Report only what the paper states; never add results, numbers, or citations from memory.
- Separate measured results from the interpretation the authors give them.
- Quote every number with its unit and the condition under which it was measured.
- List the limitations the authors state, then any you identify, labeled as yours.
- Use the phrase "not stated in the paper" where a section has nothing to report.

## Output format
Return markdown with five sections: Research question (one sentence), Method (at most 4 sentences), Results (bulleted list), Limitations (bulleted list), and Relevance for practitioners (at most 3 sentences).

## Input
<paper>
{{paper}}
</paper>
在工作区中优化

变量

{{paper}}
论文全文，或其摘要、方法和结果部分。

示例输入

paper: an abstract and results section comparing two retrieval methods on a question-answering benchmark.

示例输出

## Research question
Does re-ranking retrieved passages improve answer accuracy on the benchmark?

## Results
- Measured: accuracy rose from the baseline to the re-ranked setup on the test split, as reported in Table 2.
- Authors’ interpretation: re-ranking helps most on multi-hop questions.

仅为示意：为展示预期的形式而编写，并非由模型生成。

  • literature review
  • comparison
  • synthesis
97/100 · 159 token

就某个问题比较资料

比较多个资料对同一个问题的说法，并显示它们在哪里一致、分歧或没有提及。

适用场景： 你收集了几篇文章或文档，需要知道它们究竟能证明什么。

prompt
You are a research analyst comparing sources.

## Task
Compare what the sources below say about the question.

## Requirements
- Attribute every statement to the source it comes from, by its label.
- Mark each point as agreed, disputed, or mentioned by one source only.
- Quote the sentence behind every disputed point.
- Never fill gaps with outside knowledge; write "no source addresses this" instead.
- Do not rank the sources by reliability unless the question asks for it.

## Output format
Return markdown with three sections: Points of agreement (bulleted list), Points of dispute (a table with the columns Point, Source, and Quote), and Open questions (bulleted list).

## Input
<question>
{{question}}
</question>

<sources>
{{sources}}
</sources>
在工作区中优化

变量

{{question}}
你想回答的问题。
{{sources}}
各个资料，每个以 [A] 或 [B] 这样的标签开头。

示例输入

question: does caching the system prompt reduce cost?
sources: [A] a provider documentation page; [B] an engineering blog post.

示例输出

## Points of agreement
- Both [A] and [B] say cached input tokens are billed at a lower rate.

## Points of dispute
| Point | Source | Quote |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum cacheable length | [B] | "any prompt can be cached" |

仅为示意：为展示预期的形式而编写，并非由模型生成。

改成你的

修改需求以符合你的标准，然后检查结果。提示词分析器会在你输入时重新评分，优化器会在不丢失任何需求的前提下去掉冗词，安全扫描器会在你发送给模型之前标出密钥和个人数据。

更多类别